Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Sunday, January 16, 2011
I like finding new music but I don't really seem to be able to use ITunes to do this. Why? Because I find the best way for me to find the things that I like is to listen to a stream of new music while I work and pick out what I like by listening to the whole song. ITunes does not create this radio station like experience since they limit you to 30-90 second clips that you have to find yourself.
Everyone talks about Pandora as the best way to find new music but I find that what is plays for me is usually something I have heard before and almost never any indy music or anything really cutting edge. This may be my fault as I am picking the starting song for my station.
What I have found is a free service called The Sixty One. The TheSixtyOne does not look like any traditional website I have come across and this may be off-putting to the new visitor. The site is actually a HTML5 music player which requires flash. It uses a unique quest based system to encourage you to learn it's features and to interact socially with artists and other users.
When you first open it, it will immediately begin exposing you to new music and artists. As you begin to experiment with the controls you can make the player produce new artists based on your mood or how adventurous you are feeling at the moment. If you like a particular artist you can get the player to dwell on that artists songs for a while before moving on.
The best part is, these are not artists who are getting much in the way of exposure on radio or ITunes. I don't know how these artists are brought to this service but they do a great job finding them. The player will try to hook you up with links to purchase what you have just heard but it often fails to do this last essential part very well. I often have to go to ITunes or Amazon myself to purchase songs but that is a small price to pay for finding new music. I wonder why Apple does not look to have better integration with this service simply to move more new music. For that matter, why don't they start streaming some of their own content in a similar manner. Radio stations were always the best way to move music in the past and ITunes does not really seem to offer us any alternative to the 30 second snippet. These two services go great together.
It is a pity that there is no SixtyOne service for the iPod itself. I would love to listen in my car. There is an IPad application with a different user interface but drawing on the same idea of discovery and streaming that the flash based website provides. It is called AWEditorium and it serves up TheSixtyOne's content on an IPad.
Apple should forget or modify their Ping service and look into bringing this type of social streaming service directly to ITunes. I would sell a lot of music but If they do they should not loose the Indy feel that the service offers now.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Recently, my oldest son embarked on the path to become a software engineer just like dear old dad. Mind you, he has his goals set for the Game Design industry but which of my peers has not dreamed that dream at some point in their college career? I wish him luck in that very competitive industry.
What really struck me, however, was just how much more expensive it is to get a degree now a days in engineering and computer science. I think I payed about $60,000 dollars for my degree in the 80's but my son is going to end up paying something like $175,000 to $200,000 by the time he graduates. That is more than three times as much as I paid. Is he getting three times the education and just how long will it take for him to pay off his student loans? Will he still be paying off the equivalent of a house when he goes to buy his first house?
What of those kids who have the talent for computer science but can't raise the money or don't want to go into a single family home's worth of debt to get a degree just realize their dreams of being a career coder?
What about apprenticeship? I have worked with many undergraduates over the years as interns and many of them are extremely talented. Often times they pick up more career focused skills working in industry than they ever do in college. Some even stayed with the company well past their internships and had successful careers within software engineering without degrees. Could this talent be harnessed into a successful business model and provide a successful career path for these students?
Imagine if there was a startup company based on a core of experienced engineers that took on consulting work but staffed their teams with willing but inexperienced high school graduates? Built into this program was dedicated daily training for the staff as well as engagement in an active software development projects. It might even be possible to engage a local community collage for some of the training required. If a rigorous selection process were used to choose candidates you would get the energy, ideas and motivation of youth and the cost of their salary and training could be integrated into your consulting contract's cost for less than the cost of an experienced professional. Your business partner would get the assurance of the experienced staff member on the team and also the knowledge that choosing your company was almost the equivalent of providing a scholarship at the same time as meeting his or her business needs.
This approach would be both beneficial to the company and incredibly useful to jumpstart the apprentice's career. With about two years this person could use their education to enter the workspace with a resume significant enough to work in the field or use the credits the program gave them to pursue a degree if they felt that was their next step.
Admittedly, this is almost the mirror image of modern COOPerative education but if the education has been priced well beyond it's career building market value, perhaps this could be the future or even a winning business model able to educate young people and let them earn money and learn as they go while also being a profitable business.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Star Trek may have popularized the cell phone concept but Space 1999 had most of the feature set of the IPhone figured out in 1975 with a device called the ComLock. It was amazingly prescient of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson and their production team to think through what kind of mobile device would be in common use in 1999. Little did they know that the actual smart phone device they were envisioning would not come to pass until 2007 in the form of the IPhone, Android and other smart phones.
If you take a look at technical drawings of the ComLock you can see this device had it all. A two mile range capable of being boosted by using near by landing craft like a cell tower, a telephone keypad and a small black and white (CRT) display. It could connect to the Moonbase Alpha computer, accept voice commands and it even had a docking station to recharge. In the show’s continuity guide you can see the device in its cradle (I wonder what the battery life was on it with that CRT). Add to this, features like an infra-red capable camera, air pressure gaugue, geiger counter and thermometer and I would like to know where I could line up to buy one.
With all of these features that are so similar to today’s smart phones, why don’t we see the most basic feature of a ComLock on our cellphones - The ability to unlock physical doors? The ComLock device was required to get any door on Moonbase to open. You could not move freely anywhere without one.
Now imagine that you could have a house or work key that you would always have on you, if lost could be located using GPS and could be remotely deleted if stolen. Sounds pretty good, huh, yet this particular aspect of smart phone usage has not really been tapped yet.
There are some products that will let you do this now with an IPhone but they can be pretty expensive. Schlage offers their Link system which allows you to open their keypad locks via a web browser or a cell phone but they are charging $8.99 a month for this privilege but it will work with the current generation of cell phones. Another company is offering a simpler approach. Primary systems actually will put your door directly on your wireless network but they are targeting large facilities. What is so hard about producing a simple lock that can be accessed over WIFI that I can buy now at Home Depot?
Perhaps the industry is waiting for Near Field Communication, a technology that lets your phone communicate with very nearby devices simply for such things as credit card transactions. This is rumored to be the next big thing in cell phones allowing us to buy things just by waving our phone in front of a merchant’s sensor. This would at least insure that the person trying to open your home’s front door was actually in front of the door at the time.
In summary, I wonder if Steve Jobs was a space 1999 fan? For that matter, was Gerry Anderson a Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle fan since they were talking about similar hand held systems even earlier (1974) in their book, Mote in God’s Eye. If you want to get your hands on one, why not build your own? You can download a Paper Craft model of a ComLock. Either way, I think the Cell Phone will replace your keychain in the near future.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
I did not use a TV set. What I did do was watch re-runs on
The interesting thing is that I watched my first network TV show
(It was Heroes) of the fall and I was painfully re-acclimated with
commercials. I had gotten very used to Hulu's 15-60 second commercial
blocks and I found myself painfully re-sensitized to just how long
network television's commercials are.
Is this the future? I know that I am giving serious consideration
to just letting my favorite shows pass by on TV and just waiting
for them to show up on Hulu. When I talk to others they say something
similar. Such responses as, "Oh, yes. I stopped watching live tv a while
back. I just DVR everything now."
What is going to happen to Ad revenue when sponsors realize
that no one is watching TV commercials anymore? Hopefully they will
move more seriously to Hulu. When they do, will Hulu increase commercial
length? Hopefully they will see that 15-60 seconds is the magic number
that keeps my attention because I don't think I can go back to the
way things were before this summer.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Being flexible was always served me well in my career so far and I expect it will serve me well in the future. Not specializing to much in one area has always let me take on new opportunities when they present themselves. To quote Lazarus Long, the main character of this novel,
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."If you never become to specialized, you won't ever get to board with what you do either.
Monday, January 12, 2009
I was just digging through some of my old drawings and I found this one I did years ago. I was sitting in Barnes & Nobel looking at the murals on the wall of famous authors and wondered what it would be like if Homer Simpson were up there.
Well, wonder no longer as here he is.